FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS WAS REALLY ARRIUS PISO - Part IV

In Pliny (the works of Pliny the Younger), we find "Montanus" as a senator. From the bibliographical Index in the works of Pliny the Younger (Loeb Classical Library edition): "Montanus, unknown senator; letters on monument to freedman Pallas and honors voted him, VII. 29; VIII. 6."

We also see as we follow the trail, all of these who were involved in this fraud as well (such as Pliny the Younger). And we find, eventually, that this involved ALL of the Roman authors and we also find them to be closely related to each other - the Roman emperors and those who were writing their histories. Note that this is not a "conspiracy", but more like what would be called an "oligarchy". This should make some people sit up and take notice.

"Montanus" was spared (by Nero) out of consideration for his father (Gaius Piso, who was forced to commit suicide by Nero), with the proviso (provision) that his official career should not be continued" (Ref. Tacitus, Annals, Book XVI, XXXIII, pg. 387, Loeb). "Montanus" is also mentioned in many other places. A list of these will appear at the end of this article.

Now knowing that "Montanus" is Arrius Piso, we continue looking for "Arrius" and we now find "Arrius Antoninus".

ARRIUS ANTONINUS

Why the alias name of Arrius Antoninus? We have already found his name as "Arrius". So, we wonder why "Antoninus"? We have found examples of other alias names that were used that incorporated the use of component parts of other names and/or initials or abbreviations in some instances to create alias names/identities. And it may well be further found that there were indeed various purposes involved for the use of alias names and their component parts as yet not fully recognized, such as the use of these as "indicators" of ancestry. We are finding out more and more about these things all of the time.

Now we look at "Antoninus" and find an obvious indication of descent from the Antonii line - and as we will find as we go along, this WAS purposeful. It was given as an indication that Arrius Piso was indeed descended from Marc Antony himself. And that explains the "Antoni" portion of the invented name. When one stops to think of all of this it is truly amazing that all of this was done and remained hidden from the public for so long - but there were a variety of methods and means used by them specifically for that purpose. Even fooling the brightest of scholars up to this time. But now this all of this is known and available to everyone on the Internet - that "Dark Age" will now end.

Remembering the purpose of these alias names and also realizing that great pains were taken specifically to HIDE these things, and not to make the appear obvious (except in small bits and pieces), while likewise bearing in mind that they… the authors were most ingenious, used the royal language, etc., we can easily envision them making "double use" of letters already used in these names as just another way of further hiding hints, clues and other info.

In the alias name "Antoninus" we find the use of "ninus". What is "ninus"? "Ninus" is a secret title. It is really the Greek "nini", which is "baby" or infant - which, in reality refers, indicates and confirms that this person was "a baby" - the baby JESUS! Do you remember that it was mentioned above that Julius Piso called his father a "dragon" in the Revelations? That was because by doing so he was also pointing out that his father was "a baby boy" as that is what the word used for dragon refers to - he too was saying that Arrius Piso was JESUS!

Let’s take a moment to review what we have found so far. We found that Flavius Josephus was really just a penname of Arrius Calpurnius Piso, and that Arrius Piso had played the fictional character "Jesus" in the New Testament. We also found that Tacitus, the historian, was involved in this fraud as well as Pliny the Younger. I sincerely hope that now that all of this is known that ancient history will NEVER be viewed in the same way again. How deluded must a person be to not recognize that this is the true way in which all of this had happened? Who could read and investigate all of this and say that it is merely a coincidence? No one at all I should think, as long as they have a working brain, basic information - and are honest with themselves. "Heart" and emotionalism does not enter into this as far as the premise of "Jesus" being good, etc., because all of that is depends upon the information about "Jesus" being true - and it is not, it is a fraud.

ARRIUS VARUS

Now why "Arrius Varus" as an alias? Well, it gives Arrius a chance to use his real name of "Arrius", and that is one reason. But another is because he can really play with an use this alias while honoring himself and his descendants.

The name "Varus" is the Roman form of the Egyptian "Veru," meaning "great men", but when used as a ‘name’ of an individual it means that the man who has and uses the name is a "great man". As Arrius Verus, he is found as the founding ancestor of the later great Roman family - the "Annii Anicii." "Annius" and "Arrius" are the same as explained previously. And he (Arrius Piso) is also the founder of the "Annii Verii." Using the royal language one sees in this alias name another name that was used - "Severus." Let’s look at this.

"Arrius Verus" (vowels were interchangeable always because they are seen as not really being there excepting as to be used to make names appear to readers to be different), the ‘s’ from Arrius is given a vowel ("e") to bind it to "Verus", thus rendering "Severus". This is a name
used by Arrius Piso’s son Julius Piso as a commander of the Roman forces against the Jews in the Bar Cochba revolt.

Tacitus says; "As Antonius (that is, "Antonius Primus") hurried forward some dispatchments from the cohorts and part of the cavalry to invade Italy, he was accompanied by Arrius Varus…" He was "accompanied" by Arrius Varus, in this instance, because he was one and the same person. Naturally, where ever Antonius Primus went, Arrius Varus was sure to go… as they are the same person! Are you starting to understand just how ancient history was REALLY written? I hope so.

In the same passage, Tacitus says; "However, Antonius (Primus) and Varus (of course!) occupied Aquileia…" Yes, they were BOTH there, in one place, and in one body! Another interesting thing that Tacitus does is to call "Antonius Primus" - "Primus Antonius". One would think the purpose that Tacitus had in mind was to further confuse/confound the reader into thinking that he is speaking of two different persons, just as he does in calling Arrius Piso several different (alias) names. He is VERY actively participating in this fraud (Ref. Tacitus, II, Histories, Book III, VI, pg. 337, Loeb Classical Library edition).